Roselle Park News

Schools

2013-14 RPSD Teacher Evaluations Released By NJ DOE

By
Published: July 18, 2015 @ 8:00 AM EDT
2013-14 RPSD Teacher Evaluations Released By NJ DOE thumbnail

On Wednesday, July 15th, the New Jersey Department Of Education (NJDOE) released a state-, county-, district-, and school-level database on 2013-14 teacher evaluations. The database is a result of TEACHNJ Act, which stands for “Teacher Effectiveness and Accountability for the Children of New Jersey” Act. Passed in 2012, TEACHNJ Act has both its supporters and critics who – while agreeing on its intent to improve evaluations for teachers throughout the state – differ on the impact to student learning as well as the reliability of measuring educators’ performance.

The TEACHING Act increases one year to the tenure process (from three to four) but it also provides an opportunity for those teachers to be mentored. Additionally, a School Improvement Panel, which is a school administrator (principal) and a designee (usually a vice principal or veteran teacher), is responsible for performing the evaluations and supervising the mentoring.

The scoring was separated into four (4) different levels (‘Highly Effective’, ‘Effective’, ‘Partially Effective’, and ‘Ineffective’) with a numbering system between 1 and 4  that were obtained from averaging various elements including planning, instruction, professionalism, environment, and student growth objectives. The levels were separated, according to the NJ DOE, into the following breakdown:

LEVEL
Breakdown
Ineffective
1.0 - 1.84
Partially Effective
1.85 - 2.64
Effective
2.65 - 3.49
Highly Effective
3.5 - 4.0

The database does not contain specific evaluations of individual teachers, but that of schools and districts.

In addition to the data provided, suppression rules have been included to further remove the ability to discover an individual’s evaluation. The suppression rules applied were as follow:

  1. Records that had a count less than ten (10) were suppressed. On the NJDOE website, an example was provided where if nine (9) or fewer staff received a rating of Ineffective (or any other category), the record would be suppressed and not be part of the data file.
  2. When one performance level is suppressed due to the reason above – and all four performance level ratings are present, the next lowest staff count will be suppressed to disallow roll-up to find the rating count for the first level suppressed and thus potentially identify educators. This is why some levels have asterisks (*) in the same school or district.
  3. Records with 100% staff in one performance level are suppressed, as per state law. In such cases, only the total staff count record will be provided as part of the data file. Such is the case with Mountainside. The thinking is that the public would know the level of every single educator, be it ‘Highly Effective’, ‘Effective’, ‘Partially Effective’, and ‘Ineffective’.

In the instances where records were suppressed due to the first two rules, those combined counts would always be included in the totals.

With that background, data is provided below both on each school’s ranking of ‘Highly Effective’ teachers and the school district’s within the county and state.


In The District

The first table compares the schools within the Roselle Park School District (RPSD).


School

Ineffective
Partially
Effective

Effective
Highly
Effective

Total
%
Highly Effective
District Total
*
*
95
75
170
44.1%
Sherman Elementary School
*
*
*
16
25
64.0%
Roselle Park High School
*
*
20
34
54
63.0%
Ernest J. Finizio Jr. - Aldene School
*
*
13
10
23
43.5%
Robert Gordon Elementary School
*
*
13
[9]
22
[40.9%]
Roselle Park Middle School
*
*
39
[6]
45
[13.3%]
Bracket numbers are deduced figures in place of asterisks
Asterisks (*) denote suppression, they do not signify zero or none. See suppression rules for more information.

The evaluation, according to the data, was of 170 teachers in the school district, this even though a tally of  all school totals equals 169.

Reviewing each school, Sherman School had the highest percentage of ‘Highly Effective’ teachers at 64%, followed by Roselle Park High School (RPHS) at 63%. Roselle Park Middle School (RPMS) had the lowest ‘Highly Effective’ rating, under 13.3%. This percentage was arrived at using the suppression rule determining that RPMS had counts in more than one of the three remaining categories then verifying the count by cross-checking the column totals against the row totals.

It can also be deduced, by subtracting all the counts in the ‘Effective’ column from the total that Sherman School had ten (10) teachers that were rated at that level.


In The County

The next table has Roselle Park ranking 4th or 5th highest among Union County schools for ‘Highly Effective’ teachers.


School District

Ineffective
Partially
Effective

Effective
Highly
Effective

Total
%
Highly Effective
Mountainside
*
*
*
*
52
Suppressed
Kenilworth
*
*
12
106
118
89.8%
Winfield Park
*
*
*
15
18
83.3%
New Providence
*
*
54
107
164
65.2%
Roselle Park
*
*
95
75
170
44.1%
Cranford
*
*
202
127
334
38.0%
Summit
*
*
212
125
337
37.1%
Clark
*
*
102
57
160
35.6%
Berkeley Heights
*
*
168
47
215
21.9%
Linden
*
*
359
98
461
21.3%
Scotch Plains-Fanwood Regional
*
*
340
72
416
17.3%
Rahway
*
*
244
49
300
16.3%
Hillside
*
*
196
25
237
10.5%
Elizabeth
*
*
1,619
178
1,851
9.6%
Union Township
*
*
515
53
580
9.1%
Westfield
*
*
432
33
469
7.0%
Springfield
*
*
146
10
161
6.2%
Roselle
*
17
214
10
241
4.1%
Plainfield
*
48
481
<22
551
<4.0%
Garwood
*
*
26
<1
27
<3.7%
Asterisks (*) denote suppression, they do not signify zero or none. See suppression rules for more information.

The variance in ranking is due to the 3rd suppression rule for Mountainside where the district received either 100% in ‘Highly Effective’ or 100% in some other category. If all of Mountainside’s teachers received ‘Highly Effective’, then it would be highest, if not it would be last.

Out of the 21 municipalities in Union County, RPSD ranked higher than 15 other districts (Scotch Plains and Fanwood share one school system).


Comparatively

The final table shows RPSD in comparison to other schools not confined by municipal boundaries in Union County as well as the county and state averages. In all instances with the following data, Roselle Park ranked higher than those schools as well as the county and state averages.


School District

Ineffective
Partially
Effective

Effective
Highly
Effective

Total
%
Highly Effective
Roselle Park
*
*
95
75
170
44.1%
Statewide
205
2,558
78,099
24,897
105,759
23.5%
County
*
*
5,728
1,231
7,147
17.2%
Union County Vocational
*
*
96
12
112
10.7%
UCECS
*
*
65
6
71
<8.5%
Morris-Union Jointure
*
*
95
7
102
<6.9%
Asterisks (*) denote suppression, they do not signify zero or none. See suppression rules for more information.

Taking the evaluations throughout the state, excluding suppressed districts (there were 38 of them in line with the 3rd suppression rule) Roselle Park ranked 138th; just at the top 25% – (25.4%) of all 544 ranked school districts.


This first such ranking system will surely have debate on both the pro and con of how analogous such evaluation is to education. Among questions that will be asked regarding the methodology is whether certain districts assessed their teachers at a stricter (or more lenient) measure than others, even though some elements were not objective.

Discussions resulting from these evaluations among districts, schools, educators, parents, and communities will add another dynamic to a growing list of new initiatives – from PARCC to Common Core – that time will determine whether models of teaching in Roselle Park and New Jersey will improve or become constrained.

A copy of the raw data is available at the NJ DOE website (link) or the newspaper’s download mirror (link).

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,